What Is a Reach School Which Reach Schools Should I Choose

What Is a Reach School Which Reach Schools Should I Choose SAT / ACT Prep Online Guides and Tips For those of you who have started researching college admissions, you may have heard the term â€Å"reach school.† What is a reach school? Simply, a reach school is one that you shouldn't expect to be admitted to. It would be a reach to get in. In this article, I will define and explain the concept of a reach school. Furthermore, I will discuss how to identify your reach schools and determine the number of reach schools you should apply to. What Is a Reach School? A reach school is a college that is unlikely to offer you admission. A particular college qualifies as a reach school for you if your high school GPA and standardized test scores are significantly below those of the college's average student. Also, you should consider a college a reach school if it is one of the most selective colleges. For example, MIT, Stanford, and Ivy League colleges are reach schools for everyone due to their extremely low acceptance rates. In general, you should consider a college a reach school if you have less than a 30% chance of gaining admission. Here are some hypothetical examples to give you a better understanding of a reach school. Example #1 Joe has a 3.6 weighted GPA, a 1700 SAT score, and wants to go to UCLA. Joe's GPA is well below UCLA's average GPA of 4.29 and average SAT score of 1941. Furthermore, UCLA only admits 20% of its applicants. Therefore, Joe shouldn't expect to get into UCLA; he should consider UCLA a reach school. Typically, the only students who are offered admission with well below average numbers are highly recruited athletes in major sports, legacy students with donor parents, students from extraordinary backgrounds or circumstances, and students with amazing accomplishments. Even though colleges review your recommendations, personal essays, and extracurricular activities, gaining admission to a college is difficult with subpar grades and standardized test scores. Example #2 Regardless of your GPA and standardized test scores, for any student who wants to apply to Harvard, Harvard is a reach school. Harvard's admissions rate is only 6%. Obviously, that's an amazingly low percentage. Among Harvard students, the average high school GPA is 4.04 and the average SAT score is 2260. The 75th percentile SAT score is a perfect 2400. Even if you have a perfect GPA and perfect SAT score, Harvard is so selective that it's still a reach school. Harvard is a reach school for everyone. How to Identify Your Reach Schools Let's go through how to curate your list of schools to apply to, step-by-step. Step #1: Create Your List of Dream Schools Initially, don't consider your odds of getting in when creating your list of dream schools.Learn how to choose a collegeand use as many sources as possible to identify the colleges you want to go to. The most prestigious schools are likely to be reach schools. Use the best college search websites to help create your list. If necessary, you can also use guide books like Fiske Guide to Colleges and The Best 379 Colleges for in-depth college profiles and comparisons. Seek advice from others. Talk to your teachers, counselors, friends, and parents about colleges. Don't just blindly accept their college recommendations, but research the schools they recommend, and then determine whether or not those schools would be a good fit for you. After doing your research and consulting these various sources, you should be able to compile your list of dream schools. I recommend having about 8-15 schools on this list. If you have fewer schools, you may not be giving yourself enough options. If you have more, you probably haven't done enough to narrow down your college search and the application and selection process may end up being too costly and tedious. Step #2: Determine Which of the Schools From Your List Are Reach Schools The next step in identifying your reach schools is to determine which schools on your list of dream schools qualify as reach schools for you. How do you do this? I recommend using the PrepScholar school database. You can google â€Å"(name of school) prepscholar admissions requirements† to find a school profile for each college on your list. On the school profile, use the admissions calculator to get a rough idea of your chances of admission. The admissions calculator combines your GPA and standardized test scores with the admissions rate to approximate your chances of getting into the school. If, according to the admissions calculator, you have less than a 30% of gaining admission or the school has an admissions rate of less than 15%, then you should categorize the college as a reach school for you. Keep in mind that your GPA and SAT scores are only two components that determine whether you’re accepted to a school. Your extracurricular activities, recommendations, essays, and background play a role, too. However, GPA and SAT scores are the most important factors and they’re the most objective available statistics. How Many Reach Schools Should You Apply to? You may be wondering how many reach schools you should apply to. The number you should apply to depends on a few of different factors. Keep in mind that the college application process can be costly, if you don't qualify for application fee waivers. Also, it can be very time-consuming, especially if you apply to schools that don't use the Common Application. A general rule is to apply to 1/3 reach schools out of all the schools you apply to. If you follow this formula, then if you apply to 10 schools, no more than 3 should be considered reaches. Also, 1/3 of the schools you apply to should be safety schools, schools that typically admit students with your qualifications. The remaining 1/3 should be schools that are in the middle, colleges that give you about a 30%-80% chance of admission based on your qualifications. If the cost and time you spend on your applications doesn't matter as much to you, you can apply to more reach schools. However, you do want to make sure that you apply to enough other schools to ensure that you give yourself choices. If you're likely to get rejected by most of the schools you apply to, your options may be limited when you're selecting a college to attend. If you're not even close to the average GPA or 25th percentile SAT score at a selective college, you may be wasting your time applying. Your chances of getting in are probably close to zero unless there's something else truly extraordinary in your application or there's a building on campus named after one of your immediate family members. Quick Review A reach school is a college that is not likely to admit you, generally offering you less than a 30% chance of admission. Use the admissions rate of a college and its average GPA and standardized test scores to determine if its a reach school for you. The most selective colleges are reach schools for everyone. Apply to roughly 1/3 reach schools to ensure that you have options during the college selection process. Give yourself college options. What's Next? If you want to make yourself competitive for college admission, learn how to build the most versatile college application. For those of you who need to improve your standardized test scores, find out how to get a 2400 on the SAT or a 36 on the ACT. Want to improve your SAT score by 160 points or your ACT score by 4 points?We've written a guide for each test about the top 5 strategies you must be using to have a shot at improving your score. Download it for free now:

Top 8 Free Online Style Guides in English

Top 8 Free Online Style Guides in English Sensible is probably the highest praise that can be given to a style guide. Neither a comprehensive documentation manual (such as the MLA or APA guides) nor a self-improvement book (along the lines of Strunk and Whites The Elements of Style), a publishers style guide should provide practical and consistent advice about matters ranging from abbreviations and preferred spellings to punctuation standards and acceptable terminology. If youre not already committed to one particular code of conventions- such as The Associated Press Stylebook, the journalists bible- consider befriending one of these free online style guides. Each has its eccentricities and limitations, and no two of them agree on every fine point of usage. But theyre all sensible and reasonably consistent.   American Styles National Geographic Style Manual  Online since 1995 and frequently updated by a team of editors, this is an alphabetically arranged guide to preferred National Geographic Society style and usage.​The Tameri Guide for Writers: Generalized Stylebook  Maintained by Susan D. Schnelbach and Christopher Scott Wyatt, the Tameri Stylebook is based on the Associated Press Stylebook, which is the primary style guide for reporters and editors at daily newspapers and many periodicals.​Wikipedia: Manual of Style  This style guide for all Wikipedia articles is intended to help editors write articles with consistent, clear, and precise language, layout, and formatting. British Styles The BBC News Styleguide (pdf) Written by John Allen, a BBC reporter and editor for the past 40 years, this popular manual is not a do and dont list but a guide that invites you to explore some of the complexities of modern English usage.​Economist.com Style Guide  John Grimonds online guide is based on the stylebook followed by journalists at The Economist magazine. The 11th edition of the paperback version of the guide will be published in 2015.​The Guardian and Observer Style Guide  Edited by David Marsh and Amelia Hodsdon, this is the online version of Guardian Style. The third edition of this witty handbook was published in December 2010.​Telegraph Style Book  Augmented by monthly style notes from associate editor Simon Heffer, this is the official guide to house style for The Daily Telegraph, The Sunday Telegraph, and Telegraph.co.uk. Canadian Styles The Canadian Style  Compiled by the Canadian governments Translation Bureau, Canadian Style includes useful advice for drafting letters, memos, reports, indexes and bibliographies along with concise answers to questions concerning written English in the Canadian context.

The Case of Enron and Arthur Andersen Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

The Case of Enron and Arthur Andersen - Essay Example The greed that was evident did not benefit any one party at all. When the company shares lost ground in trading, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Texas State Board of Public Accountancy and the US congress were on hand to instigate reforms that had the aim of ensuring that occurrences like those at Enron could not occur again. Arthur Andersen, the auditor at Enron, could be said to have received what it deserved in terms of being forced out of the market place due to bankruptcy. Additionally, the audit firm became a template of negative audit firms. The US federal government crafted regulatory legislation that is being taken up by other countries to prevent such occurrences in the future. For example, Mexico adopted those regulations in 2006 popularly referred to as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Discussion Enron as a corporate entity was not guilty of any major crimes that were blatantly obvious. On the most part, the company was indicted for misleading the outside forces charged with consulting for it and also misrepresented its financial situation1. These misrepresentations and falsehoods cannot entirely be considered as crimes. On the contrary, fraud can be considered as a crime but the very act of proving a criminal intent to defraud is very difficult. On the other hand, Arthur Andersen was convicted of a repeated single crime which entailed the obstruction of justice. This was largely due to the destruction of Enron documents that the audit firm continuously did. The shredding of those documents, which the accounting firm was well aware could be used in an SEC investigation, was in itself a crime. The case of Enron led to a number of individuals that were charged with different tasks to be charged with serious crimes with some of them pleading guilty to some. Mostly, many pleaded guilty with conspiracy to mislead that they did by presenting unfair reports on the company finances. Both Enron and Andersen had total disregard for any ethical conduc t that was expected of them. There is no need for detailed presentation of the breaches in ethics as they were pretty blatant. This discussion is not focused on ethics despite the fact that legal ethics, financial analysis ethics and banking ethics were totally disregarded. Since the breach of ethics is not a crime, it is not pertinent to dwell on it. Enron is clearly in violation of the guidelines that are laid out in the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)2. There are three instances of the breach of GAAP that are notable in the conduct of Enron. The first is that the Special Purpose Entities? (SPEs) accounts were incorrect. The equity method of accounting was selectively utilized in the SPE accounting as well as the failure of consolidation and failure of the elimination of the impacts associated with the transactions carried among the entities. The second is that there was partial disclosure of accounts and the last is that the financial reporting was not fair. In do ing the above, Enron and Andersen can be thought of having viewed GAAP as being merely rules and not regulations. They also leaned towards the interpretation of GAAP in a more aggressive manner than normally envisaged. Additionally, they disregarded the fairness principle that is central to GAAP and in doing this, they ignored the fact that fairness is emphasized more that rules as well as accounting that focuses on the economic

Relationship between Different Components of an Airport Research Paper

Relationship between Different Components of an Airport - Research Paper Example Landside portion; this portion consists of the arrival and departure enclosures, passenger handling area, baggage handling area, cargo handling, and processing area, retail, and catering area.  Landside portion; this portion consists of the arrival and departure enclosures, passenger handling area, baggage handling area, cargo handling, and processing area, retail, and catering area.  Airside portion; this portion consists of the runway, taxiway and the area where the aircraft stands before and after takeoff and landing respectively.  The above figure shows that an ideal airport should be having one side for its ‘departure’ functions while the other side is kept for ‘arrival’ functions. Both of these converge into the front or the urban access portion for seamless integration.  Suppose at present the airport handles 2.5 million passengers and it is being estimated that by 2016 it would have to handle 5 million passengers annually. The airport would h ave to go for expansion in the context of runways, terminals, taxiways, and allied services. The airport is important for the adjoining area from the perspective of economy, business, tourism, and social development.  Ã¢â‚¬ ¢ Points of consideration: Land issues: The existing airport when going for expansion would require a huge amount of land. There could be scientific, social, environmental as well as political issues in the context of acquiring land, which have to be taken into account. Runway-taxiway: Runways and taxiways should ideally run parallel. The dimensions of the former would depend on the number, size, and type of aircraft being handled.   The size and dimensions of taxiways would depend on the number of passengers being handled and the probable increase in the number in the future.

The Pritting Press Essay -- essays research papers

In 1440 a man by the man of Johannes Gutenberg invented movable type, or as we know it, a printing press. Prior to 1440 everything read in Europe was copied by hand or copied from wooden blocks carved from hand. This was very expensive and time consuming. The only people who were literate were those of the church and a small percentage of nobility. Since the printing press came out, how would this effect European culture and the way things worked?   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  The printing press had many effects on Europe. Very few peasants could read and besides that there wasn’t much to read but scriptures. The things that were being read were hand written and of course this took a long time and so not many people wanted to take the time to do it. Monks spent there days and nights copying and writing scriptures in solitude. At the time Latin was the only language the bible was written in, this was about to change.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  The time the printing press was invented was the era of the Renaissance. The Renaissance era is known for inventions and art and new ideas. The printing press was just one of the many inventions that came out of the Renaissance era. I believe this to be one of the biggest inventions to come out around this time because it changed everything and the way we read now. I am sure that someone else later would have thought of this but for the time if brought on new ideas.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Some of the ideas that came about we...

Angles and Demons by Dan Brown Essay

Angles and Demons by Dan Brown was a reading choice out of curiosity rather than real interest because of the Da Vinci Code by the same author. I wanted to see what other works of fiction Dan Brown came up with before his controversial book. This book had me raising my eyebrows more than a few times with story line but that did not stop me from turning the pages until I got to the end. Angels and Demons basically follows the same formula as the Da Vinci Code. It begins with a murder which only Robert Langdon seems capable of solving with his knowledge of religious iconology and history; a strong female character, Vittoria Vetra, daughter to the murder victim Leonardo Vetra, assists Langdon in his â€Å"quest†; a hired assassin who is delusional, a fanatic and has unquestionable loyalty to his belief carries out an unforeseen but well-crafted plan; an ancient secret society, the Illuminati, is out to get revenge on the Church; finally, an unexpected mastermind who calls himself as Janus, works behind the curtains. An anti-matter canister was stolen from CERN when Leonardo Vetra was murdered and this is assumed to have a life span of 24 hours before the batteries die and it explodes. Brown remains true to using archaic bits of knowledge to leave a trail for Robert Langdon and Vittoria Vetra to follow from Switzerland to the Vatican City in order to find the missing anti-matter canister and find the murderer of Leonardo Vetra. The plot thickens when the anti-matter canister bomb threatens the Vatican and the conclave in the process of choosing the new Pope. The book ends dramatically with a seemingly miraculous event followed by the declaration of a new Pope. Though I enjoyed the chase more from Angels and Demons rather than the Da Vinci Code, I must say that, as a priest, Brown seems have some issues with the Church to come up with troubling concepts for his books. First you have Leonardo Vetra, a priest who turns away from the Church. He becomes a leading physicist of CERN and, together with his adopted daughter, tries to find God through science and research. They seem to be successful with the development of the anti-matter, which was stolen when Vetra was murdered. You also have a Pope who sired a child with a nun, though through artificial means. The child later becomes his camerlengo, the Pope’s Chamberlain. The camerlengo, Carlo Ventresca, unaware of his paternal parentage, murders the Pope upon knowing his dark secret with the belief that he is both cleansing and protecting the Church. Though the book is admittedly a work of fiction, it borders on tarnishing how Catholics and non-Catholics may view the Church and its priests. Brown puts into question the honesty and loyalty of priests to the Mother Church and their commitment to the vow of celibacy, as seen with the Pope. It is appalling to think that Jesus’ surrogates on Earth would be the first ones to violate their vows. Brown also pits religion versus science. Leonardo Ventra is murdered for his research on anti-matter which can supposedly prove the beginning of life, that science can prove God’s existence. I’d like to think that religion is a matter of faith and science is a matter of fact, the two just can’t mix when it comes to explaining God. Then you have the camerlengo who is himself delusional and a fanatic in his belief that the Church, and not science, is the saving power of the world with himself at the wheel of salvation. He goes to great lengths to get the world’s attention, discredit Science and put the Church on a pedestal for the world to see. Angels and Demons made me uncomfortable with the image of the Church that it created – a divided, secretive, vindictive and vulnerable body. Readers, both Catholics and non-Catholics should be discriminating of the events in this book, lest they forget that this is only a work of fiction.

The Watergate Scandal In The United States of America - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 5 Words: 1641 Downloads: 2 Date added: 2019/07/30 Category History Essay Level High school Tags: Watergate Scandal Essay Did you like this example? On June 17, 1972 five men were arrested for breaking into the Democratic National Committee headquarters at the Watergate Complex in Washington, DC. This began the biggest political scandal in presidential history. At the same time, it also began a massive cover up that was attempted by Nixon and his aides, but eventually failed and only served to incriminate him. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "The Watergate Scandal In The United States of America" essay for you Create order At first glance, it may be difficult to understand how a seemingly third-rate burglary could be connected all the way up to Nixon and his administration. There would be a great amount of evidence, speculation, and guilt surrounding Richard Nixon that eventually resulted in him being the first and only President to ever resign from office. It required much effort from the media and reporters Robert Woodward and Carl Bernstein played a crucial role in solving the case. The Watergate Scandal tore apart The United States of America and resulted in tragedy for Richard Nixon and his administration while bringing triumph to Robert Woodward, Carl Bernstein, and other investigative reporters. The Watergate Scandal involved a lot of illegal activities that were meant to help President Richard Nixon win his re-election. The scandal included burglary, wiretapping, finance violations, and the use of government power to harm political enemies (Baughman). A major part of the scandal was also the cover-up and lies of all these illegal and inappropriate actions. Watergate, however, was not like previous political scandals because greed did not appear to play as an important factor. Instead, Watergate went after one of the chief figures of our country. The Watergate Scandal received its title from the Watergate Complex in Washington D.C. This large office building was the home to the Democratic National Headquarters, and the site of the break-in that started this story. However, even before it occurred, President Nixon had begun illegal and suspicious activities. President Nixon created a special investigation unit to prevent the leaking of confidential documents that he did not want the public to see (Fritz). He did this after Defense Department papers were released into the public revolving around President Nixons concerns over criticism of his Vietnam War policies. The Plumbers, as they were nicknamed, were lead by two of Nixons top aides, G. Gordon Liddy and E. Howard Hunt (Morton). In order to prevent any information leaks, the Plumbers investigated the personal lives of Richard Nixons political opponents. The White House responded to these actions of the plumbers by saying that they were defending National Security. The actual scandal began on June 17, 1972, with the initial arrest of five men for breaking into the Democratic Partys National Headquarters located in the Watergate Complex in Washington D.C. These five men were part of the Committee to Re-Elect Richard Nixon. They were trying to repair a broken phone tap that they had installed roughly one month before. The five men were charged with burglary and wiretapping (Friedman). Over the next few months as time passed this minor break-in turned into a full blown political scandal. The Washington Post had two highly regarded reporters who researched deep into the investigation. These two men were Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward, and they were able to find that one of the suspects had an address book that matched name and phone number of a White House official who could have potentially been involved in the crime (Fritz). The two reporters suspected that the break-in had been ordered by high up White House officials that surrounded Nixon. In a press conference in August of 1972, President Nixon claimed that no one on the White House Staff was involved in this crime. The majority of the public population accepted Nixons word and dropped any questioning they may have had. But when the burglars were forced into trial four months later, this investigation turned into a political scandal. When first questioned on the investigation in 1973, Richard Nixon denied all allegations that he or any White House official was linked to this crime. Later, evidence was discovered that connected a handful of White House officials to the break-in, and or the cover-up and concealment of the evidence. This information proved that White House officials had attempted reached out to the CIA about covering up the crime. In April 1973, prosecutor Archibald Cox was appointed to handle this case. Presidential Council John W. Dean III became the chief witness against President Nixon and testified against him in the court of hearings. On trial, Dean admitted that he was apart of the scandal and that Nixon was well aware of the illegal activities being committed by his administration and council (Samuels). Dean also testified that Nixon had plans to manipulate the IRS and other government agencies to punish people who the White House had placed on what they referred to as an enemies-lists (Melvin). Dean served four months in prison for his role in the Watergate Scandal, but opened a new door through his testimony. Through a more intense investigation it was discovered by Alexander P. Butterfield, that President Nixon had made tape recordings of conversations with fellow officials in his administration. When asked to release the tapes President Nixon refused, claiming that he had a constitutional right to keep the tapes private. He was then ordered by the court to hand over the tapes without further negotiation. Nixon offered to provide summaries for all of the tapes, but his proposal was rejected and he was once again ordered to hand over all of the original tapes. Completely at crossroads by the courts decision, he commanded his attorney general and his deputy attorney general to fire Cox. For their refusal to fire Cox, both Attorney General Elliot Richardson and Deputy Attorney General William Ruckelshaus were relieved of their duties as well. This series of events by Richard Nixon was remembered as the Saturday Night Massacre (Genovese). When Cox was fired, Leon Jaworski was appointed and selected to take his place. The firing of Cox, in many ways, did not work to Richard Nixons advantage. In April of 1974, Jaworski ordered Nixon to release the tape recordings and various documents of over 64 White House conversations and proceedings. By the end of April, Nixon had given up 1,254 pages of transcripts and recordings from White House conversations. However, Jaworski was not pleased with this. He demanded that Nixon turn over the original tapes. With President Nixon refusing give the court the original tapes, Jaworski sued him and won the lawsuit. In July, The Supreme Court demanded Nixon to hand over all of the original tapes and ruled that the President cannot withhold any evidence in a criminal case (Friedman). With the tapes in possession, Jaworski began the Watergate trial. In March of 1974, seven of Nixons former members of his council and re-election committee were charged with conspiracy in the cover-up of the initial break-in. Among these seven men were, John D. Ehrlichman, H.R. Haldeman, and John N. Mitchell. They were all found guilty in court of conspiracy, obstruction of justice, and perjury. They were finally sentenced to 2 and a half to 8 years in prison. Their prison terms were later reduced to just 1 to 4 years at minimum. G. Gordon Liddy and E. Howard Hunt were also indicted for their involvement as plumbers in this crime and for their involvement in attempting to cover up the scandal. They were sentenced to 1 to 4 years in prison as well (Samuels). In July 1974, the House Judiciary Committee voted a landslide to impeach President Nixon. They used three articles of impeachment in their decision: obstruction of justice, abusing presidential powers, and illegally withholding evidence from the judiciary committee. On August 5, Nixon finally gave up the final three transcripts of the White House recordings. These final recordings were dated back to six days after the initial break-in. These conversations revealed that Nixon had ordered the FBI to give up on its investigation of the break-in. Nixon ordered them to wrap up the investigation because he feared that the FBI would discover the involvement of his administration. After the release of these final tapes, Nixon lost all of his support in Congress. With no support, and theoretically already impeached, President Nixons top aides advised him to resign. On August 9, 1974 President Richard M. Nixon wisely followed their advice, and resigned from the presidency to officially avoid i mpeachment. Vice President Gerald R. Ford replaced immediately. On September 8, 1974 President Ford pardoned Richard Nixon of all crimes that he had committed while serving as the President of the United States of America (Morton). The resignation of the President, accounted to nearly forty people, and a nation in clear disgust were not the only results of the Watergate Scandal. Richard Nixon would become the first and only President to ever resign from office. In 1974 Congress approved reforms in the financing of political campaigns and certain criteria regarding it (Fritz). The reforms limited the amount of money that could be received by contributors and donors of various sorts and required detailed reporting of all contributions and spending fees. These new laws were adopted shortly after by state legislation as well. The Watergate Scandal tore apart The United States of America and resulted in tragedy for Richard Nixon and his administration while bringing triumph to Robert Woodward, Carl Bernstein, and other investigative reporters. It is hard to imagine that the President of the United States could commit a criminal act to this extent while serving the country. Many citizens initially doubted that the burglary would be connected to Nixon and his administration. Various people played crucial roles in incriminating Nixon and proving his guilt. At the end of it all, American citizens were disgusted with Richard Nixon and simply could not believe what he had done. If it wasnt for the efforts of investigative reporters such as Robert Woodward and Carl Bernstein, Richard Nixon may have never been caught, changing the course of history for our nation.